Commit 43fd1680 authored by Richard M. Stallman's avatar Richard M. Stallman

(byte-after-unbind-ops): Delete byte-equal.

parent 4e306308
......@@ -1313,11 +1313,14 @@
(defconst byte-after-unbind-ops
'(byte-constant byte-dup
byte-symbolp byte-consp byte-stringp byte-listp byte-numberp byte-integerp
byte-eq byte-equal byte-not
byte-eq byte-not
byte-cons byte-list1 byte-list2 ; byte-list3 byte-list4
byte-interactive-p)
;; How about other side-effect-free-ops? Is it safe to move an
;; error invocation (such as from nth) out of an unwind-protect?
;; No, it is not, because the unwind-protect forms can alter
;; the inside of the object to which nth would apply.
;; For the same reason, byte-equal was deleted from this list.
"Byte-codes that can be moved past an unbind.")
(defconst byte-compile-side-effect-and-error-free-ops
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment