Commit 4b1ed1bb authored by Chong Yidong's avatar Chong Yidong

* advice.texi (Argument Access in Advice): Note that argument

positions are zero-based (Bug#3932).
parent 84b17ab0
2009-08-15 Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
* advice.texi (Argument Access in Advice): Note that argument
positions are zero-based (Bug#3932).
* commands.texi (Distinguish Interactive): Minor copyedit.
* display.texi (Face Attributes): Add xref to Displaying Faces for
......
......@@ -603,11 +603,11 @@ for that function.
A more robust method is to use macros that are translated into the
proper access forms at activation time, i.e., when constructing the
advised definition. Access macros access actual arguments by position
regardless of how these actual arguments get distributed onto the
argument variables of a function. This is robust because in Emacs Lisp
the meaning of an argument is strictly determined by its position in the
argument list.
advised definition. Access macros access actual arguments by their
(zero-based) position, regardless of how these actual arguments get
distributed onto the argument variables of a function. This is robust
because in Emacs Lisp the meaning of an argument is strictly
determined by its position in the argument list.
@defmac ad-get-arg position
This returns the actual argument that was supplied at @var{position}.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment