Commit c14dd816 authored by Glenn Morris's avatar Glenn Morris
Browse files

*** empty log message ***

parent 8d0a725c
......@@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ author should be removed and the year(s) transferred to the FSF); or
else it is possible the file should not be in Emacs at all (please
report!).
Note that it seems painfully clear that one cannot rely on CVS logs,
or even ChangeLogs, for older changes. People often installed changes
from others, without recording the true authorship.
[For reference, most of these points were established via email with
rms, 2007/1, "Copyright years".]
......@@ -96,6 +100,9 @@ lispintro/install-sh
etc/edt-user.doc
- update BOTH notices in this file
etc/letter.pbm.letter.xpm
- trivial, no notice needed.
leim/CXTERM-DIC/4Corner.tit, ARRAY30.tit, CCDOSPY.tit, ECDICT.tit,
ETZY.tit, PY-b5.tit, Punct-b5.tit, Punct.tit, QJ-b5.tit, QJ.tit,
SW.tit, TONEPY.tit, ZOZY.tit
......@@ -150,11 +157,6 @@ src/acldef.h, chpdef.h, ndir.h
NB we would like to re-add this file if we can. Please let us know
if you can clarify its legal status.
etc/gnus-refcard.tex
etc/gnus-booklet.ps
- gnus logo (= GNU Emacs logo) is FSF assigned.
*** These are copyright issues that need not be fixed until after
Emacs 22 is released (though if they can be fixed before, that is
......@@ -171,6 +173,10 @@ not affect a release).
REMOVED etc/orgcard.tex, orgcard.ps
Re-add these files if an assignment is received from Rooke.
etc/images
Image files from GTK, Gnome are under GPLv2 (no "or later"?). RMS will
contact image authors in regards to future switch to v3.
src/acldef.h, chpdef.h, ndir.h
On legal advice from Matt Norwood, the following comment was added
......@@ -212,14 +218,22 @@ might be ugly. Please tell me if you encounter one that is under 60
lines."
Clarify the legal status of many image files. It's not necessary
to put a notice in each image (where the format allows it). It's OK to
put the information in a README file in the associated directory.
Files can be listed in groups. See etc/README for an example.
Image files to consider (is there such a thing as a "trivial" image?):
etc/emacs.xbm, gnu.xpm
etc/images/
nt/icons
Clarify the legal status of image files. It's not necessary to put a
notice in each image (where the format allows it). It's OK to put the
information in a README file in the associated directory. Files can be
listed in groups. See etc/README for an example.
Image files to consider:
etc/emacs.xbm, gnu.xpm # rms: ask fx at gnu.org
etc/emacs.icon
etc/images/info, mh-logo
etc/images/gnus/
etc/images/gud/ # just add details for Red Hat icons (rms or nickrob?)
etc/images/mail/repack, reply-from, reply-to
etc/images/smilies/
nt/icons/
rms: "Can you find this by searching for items in copyright.list that
assign images for Emacs?" [this suggests we ask Bill Wohler]
admin/check-doc-strings
Author is Martin Buchholz, but no assignment from him on file, and
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment