Commit f6132e5a authored by Juanma Barranquero's avatar Juanma Barranquero
Browse files

lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Fix argument name in docstring.

parent 5e7a95b0
2011-03-01 Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
* emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (lexical-let*): Fix argument name in docstring.
2011-03-01 Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
 
* calendar/cal-hebrew.el (calendar-hebrew-birthday, diary-hebrew-date):
......
......@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ Not documented
;;;;;; do-all-symbols do-symbols dotimes dolist do* do loop return-from
;;;;;; return block etypecase typecase ecase case load-time-value
;;;;;; eval-when destructuring-bind function* defmacro* defun* gentemp
;;;;;; gensym) "cl-macs" "cl-macs.el" "0904b956872432ae7cc5fa9abcefce63")
;;;;;; gensym) "cl-macs" "cl-macs.el" "b3031039e82679e5b013ce1cbf174ee8")
;;; Generated autoloads from cl-macs.el
(autoload 'gensym "cl-macs" "\
......@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
(autoload 'lexical-let* "cl-macs" "\
Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
successive bindings within VARLIST, will create lexical closures
as in Common Lisp. This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
Common Lisp.
......
......@@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ lexical closures as in Common Lisp.
(defmacro lexical-let* (bindings &rest body)
"Like `let*', but lexically scoped.
The main visible difference is that lambdas inside BODY, and in
successive bindings within BINDINGS, will create lexical closures
successive bindings within VARLIST, will create lexical closures
as in Common Lisp. This is similar to the behavior of `let*' in
Common Lisp.
\n(fn VARLIST BODY)"
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment